INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly being developed and deployed to support clinical decision-making, care delivery and patient monitoring in healthcare. However, the adoption of AI-driven solutions by nurses, who...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews are essential for synthesizing research in health sciences; however, they are resource-intensive and prone to human error. The data extraction phase, in which key details of studies are identified and recorded in a syst...
INTRODUCTION: The second iteration of the National Early Warning Score has been adopted widely within the UK and internationally. It uses routinely collected physiological measurements to standardise the assessment and response to acute illness. Its ...
BACKGROUND: Risk of bias (RoB) assessment is an essential part of systematic reviews that requires reading and understanding each eligible trial and RoB tools. RoB assessment is subject to human error and is time-consuming. Machine learning-based too...
INTRODUCTION: Predictive scoring systems support clinicians in decision-making by estimating the prognosis of patients in intensive care units (ICUs). However, there is limited evidence on the accuracy of these systems in predicting mortality and org...
INTRODUCTION: Marginalised populations-such as racialised groups, low-income individuals, newcomers and those in rural areas-disproportionately experience severe diabetes-related complications, including diabetic foot ulcers, retinopathy and amputati...
In the context of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP), Systematic Reviews (SRs), Meta-Analyses (MAs) and overview of reviews have become cornerstones for the synthesis of research findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Anal...
Systematic literature review (SLR) is an important tool for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR) evidence synthesis. SLRs involve the identification and selection of pertinent publications and extraction of relevant data elements from full-t...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) require substantial time and human resources, especially during the screening phase. Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown the potential to expedite screening. However, their use in generating structured PICOS (...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are essential to formulate evidence-based guidelines but require time-consuming and costly literature screening. Large Language Models (LLMs) can be a powerful tool to expedite SRs.
Join thousands of healthcare professionals staying informed about the latest AI breakthroughs in medicine. Get curated insights delivered to your inbox.